Boldness Is All: Some Thoughts on Murderbot

Now that the first (but thankfully, not last) season of Apple TV’s Murderbot series has wrapped up, I thought it would be fun to chat about it for a bit. For those not in the know, the Murderbot TV show comes from showrunners Paul and Chris Weitz (who have directed and/produced many films and tv shows both together and separately) and stars Alexander Skarsgard in the title role. The show is adapted from the science fiction novella series, The Murderbot Diaries by Martha Wells. The first season specifically adapts the first installment in the series, All Systems Red.

Spoiler Warning: As I am speaking in broad terms about the whole season of Murderbot AND the book series to some degree, this is going to be very spoiler heavy. Continue at your own risk.

The series follows the self-named Murderbot, a construct (part organic, part tech) Security Unit (SecUnit) who comes from the dystopian-ish Corporation Rim, a series of aligned systems, worlds, and corporate entities that control much of the galaxy. In the Corporation Rim, SecUnits and other constructs are considered objects to be owned, not sentient beings with lives and rights. SecUnits are leased as equipment. If they do not obey orders and fulfill their contracts, they can be punished, erased, or dismantled. And they are controlled by Governor Modules built into their systems. But Murderbot has secretly hacked its Governor Module, meaning that it is no longer forced to follow orders. What does it do with this freedom? It keeps doing its job anyway, and spends its free time consuming media (television dramas, music, etc.). In the first book, All Systems Red, Murderbot is leased on a contract to a team of researchers on an alien planet. This research team, PresAux, comes from a non-corporate-aligned free world called Preservation Alliance that is, basically, a socialist democratic utopia. The group becomes entangled in a conspiracy of coporate espionage and murder, requiring Murderbot to save its human clients from death while trying to hide the fact that it is, in fact, a rogue unit. Shenanigans ensue, of course.

Murderbot in full armor in fight mode.

The novella series is hugely popular. I’ve been reading them almost since the beginning (I think I picked them up when the third book was a new release? But I don’t really remember). I love these books with all my heart (I keep shoving them at people, including my best friend, my mother, my brother, etc). And I was so ecstatic when Apple TV announced their adaptation. That’s not to say there wasn’t some worry. There always is when a beloved book is adapted for screen. The process does not always go well, and often distorts the original work out of all recognition. Still, I was hopeful because Apple TV has a good track record with their science fiction properties, giving them good budgets, good actors, good marketing, and usually at least a few seasons (unlike the other big streaming entity… cough Netlfix cough).

As the show’s release got closer and more news was revealed bit by bit, some fans were concerned about the choice to cast Alexander Skarsgard in the lead role. Murderbot is very explicitly non-gendered and uses it/its pronouns. Some felt that Skarsgard was too blatantly masculine for the role. I was particularly intrigued by the discussions on Reddit and elsewhere between fans arguing over whether Murderbot was canonically more masculine or feminine presenting in physical appearance. A number of fans professed that the always pictured it with more feminine features. This has fascinated me because, while Murderbot is genderless, or nonbinary, the cover art on the books give Murderbot (at least to my eyes) a masculine-leaning body type (which Martha Wells approved). And the characters around Murderbot describe it as tall and intimidating, which to me generally means at least nominally male (obviously women can be tall and intimidating too, but still). Additionally, the novellas are all written in first-person narration, from Murderbot’s perspective, and the audiobooks are narrated by Kevin R. Free. A masculine voice (which Martha Wells approved). I think, for better or worse, there is a common image in people’s minds that being nonbinary or non-gendered means, by its nature, being androgynous. But a person can look physically very masculine and still be nonbinary, or agender.

Murderbot without its helmet, watching its media feed.

Suffice to say, some fans were concerned.

Dr. Mensah (Noma Dumezweni) and Gurathin (David Dastmalchian)

I believe that Alexander Skarsgard allayed all those concerned by the end of the first episode of the series. And then blew them all out of the water in the subsequent episodes. All of the acting is excellent, of course. The basically unanimous opinion is that Noma Dumezweni as Ayda Mensah, and David Dastmalchian as Gurathin, were particularly amazing in their roles. But, perhaps unsurprisingly, the standout performance comes from Skarsgard, who absolutely knocked it out of the park. Skarsgard perfectly captures Murderbot’s awkwardness and social anxiety. One of the things that I love about the character in the books is Murderbot’s disdain for emotions, its constant insistence that it absolutely does not feel things like concern or caring or attachment for its soft, squishy human clients even as its actions prove the opposite. Skarsgard’s facial expressions, his use of his eyes in particular, is subtle and effective, wonderfully portraying Murderbot’s efforts to pretend it does not have emotions while actively displaying them.

In addition to the acting, I feel the design work really stands out. The design and look of the sets, the technology, the worlds, the alien animals, and so on was really phenomenal. It felt appropriately SF-ish and space-opera-y, but also solid and real and lived-in. The designers, writers, and so forth really paid attention to the fine detail work, and that often makes all the difference.

Socially anxious Murderbot facing the wall. (You and me both, Murderbot).

For the most part, I also feel the show captures the vibe of the books, which are SF adventure with a deeply comedic edge to them, due primarily to Murderbot’s dry, self-deprecating and sardonic first-person narration. The show tried to tread a careful line between action-adventure and comedy. While some complained about the voice-over narration, I personally feel that you could not have Murderbot without the voice-over narration. Basically the entire book series is nothing but voice-over narration, as Murderbot recounts its adventures to a log. And I felt the Skarsgard’s delivery of Murderbot’s commentary, all dry wit and heavy sarcasm, was absolutely spot-on.

That said, I do feel that the show’s efforts to balance the comedic tone was not always successful. At times, especially in the first half of the season, it sometimes felt too sitcom-y to me. The human researchers were just a bit too bumbling. A bit too silly. The gags and pratfalls were a bit too over-the-top. Even as the story turns more serious by the end, the human characters (particularly Ratthi, Pin-Lee, and Arada) were just a bit too cartoonishly naive. Mensah and Gurathin have some weight and complexity. The others, not so much. To be fair, the first book does not flesh them out in immense detail either. That happens slowly over several books. Still, in an effort to craft characters with minimal material to work from, the show leans far too heavily on the idea of Preservation Alliance as a space-hippie commune gag and makes the characters appear more like clueless idiot children, rather than naive but still perfectly competent professionals. These are, after all, all scientists and researchers (well, Pin-Lee is a lawyer, but same idea).

I had some other minor quibbles with some writing/directing choices in the show, but that was my one sort of major complaint. And, clearly, it wasn’t so damning an issue that I stopped watching. I did not love all the choices and changes made. I recognize that every book-to-screen adaptation makes changes. That is the nature of the game, and I am generally pretty good at separating the two. Some changes are necessary because of format differences, or because some things simply do not work as well on screen as they do in written form, and vice versa. Some changes happen to fill in details. After all, All Systems Red is a short novella. The world-building details are limited and strategically placed for maximum effect. But by its nature, a visual media requires far more detail. So the showrunners, writers, and designers have to make up a lot to fill in all the gaps. And for the most part, I think the Wietz Brothers, et al, did a phenomenal job of doing this. For instance, the addition of scenes from the in-universe Rise and Fall of Sanctuary Moon show was hilarious, glorious even (John Cho and Clark Gregg are having way too much fun in those scenes). But some changes just felt… odd and unnecessary. Not required by either the format or the narrative. For instance, the LeBeeBee character was strange and, to me vat least, really annoying (I recognize that quite a few people on the Murderbot Reddit that she was amusing). But again, these complaints are fairly minor, all things considered.

John Cho and Clark Gregg as the main characters of Sanctuary Moon

On the whole, I really enjoyed the series. It was fun and high-energy and entertaining, with some really great film work and some phenomenal acting. I was excited for the new episode every week, and I am ecstatic that it has been confirmed for a second season. I’ve watched every episode 2-3 times now. And I suspect a book series re-read is in order soon, at which point I will probably go through the season again with new eyes. And in the meantime, I am already enjoying the lively discussions in fandom spaces about what Paul and Chris Weitz will do with the second season. One thing I am particularly curious about is how they will address the fact that none of the PresAux team appear in books 2 and 3. Will they stay true to the books and portray Murderbot’s solo adventures? Or will they rework the material somehow so that they can keep the current cast of characters involved in some way. Given the love almost every fan has professed for Gurathin in particular, I honestly would not blame them if they did keep him around somehow. It’ll likely be a year or two before we’ll find out, but I can’t wait to see!

In Defense of Pixar’s Elio

The next Disney/Pixar movie, Elio, released on June 20th and by all accounts had dismal first weekend earnings. This can be attributed to several things, no doubt. For one, I’ve seen many complaints about the lack of marketing. I’ll be honest, I saw a decent amount of marketing for the movie, including internet ads and the trailer. But I suppose I’m not a good sample because I am chronically on the Disney+ app or watching reruns of Phineas and Ferb and The Owl House on the Disney Channel. In other words, I’m a massive Disney nerd and I always know about every single new release they have. On the other hand, apparently the average adult movie goer did not see much marketing and was barely aware what Elio was, let alone when it was releasing.

This has been a problem with a lot of media lately. Not just from Disney, though it is a major problem at Disney, which has seemed lately to be reluctant to market its Pixar releases. But its been a problem with a lot of recent productions, both film and television. I think, for instance, about a lot of Netflix releases that have come and gone almost without any notice at all. Netflix makes something, refuses to market it in the slightest, and then complains that it did not perform well. Almost as if they are trying to tank some titles.

Anyway, that is certainly a contributing factor. However, as SF author John Scalzi very effectively argued in a thread on BlueSky, this has often been the case for animated science fiction movies. Many excellent animated SF movies have underperformed in the box office through no fault of their own, for reasons I really cannot guess at.

So, for those who maybe weren’t aware this movie existed, or did not feel another underperforming Disney/Pixar movie is worth your time, let me just say: ELIO IS VERY GOOD, ACTUALLY.


I don’t always love what Disney has been doing lately, creatively or politically or economically. For instance, I’ve seen reports that Disney execs made significant last minute changes to Elio to remove a queer character. I hate that. But I’m not surprised by it. In the last few years, Disney has been backtracking the very LITTLE progress they had made in LGBTQ representation very quickly. I don’t like it, but I’m used to it. And while that frustrates me, I do not believe it takes away from the ways in which Elio was genuinely very good. It is beautifully animated, emotionally resonant, and just plain fun.

The basic premise is this: middle-schooler Elio’s parents have recently died (in an unspecified accident). Elio has gone to live with his aunt who works for the Air Force as a space debris analyst and hopes one day to join NASA. Elio is… an odd child, a quirky loner. His aunt feels overwhelmed and conflicted. He feels unwanted and alone. After sneaking into a museum exhibit about the Voyager Space Probe (narrating, to my delight, by Kate Mulgrew, Captain Janeway of the starship Voyager in Star Trek), Elio decides that aliens exist and will surely want him if no one else does. Thus launches his quest, aided by ham radio, enormous rock signals on the beach, and much mischief, to get himself abducted. To everyone’s shock, he succeeds! He makes contact with a group of alien ambassadors who mistake him for the leader of planet Earth. A series of misunderstandings, well-intentioned lies, and general shenanigans ensure. Elio makes friends, his aunt learns to appreciate his quirks, and several crises are averted.


Much like Lilo & Stitch (the original, not the abysmal live action), this movie is about the value of family, the importance of being yourself no matter the opposition, and learning not only to accept but to celebrate diversity, individuality, and general WEIRDNESS. It’s also about the wonder and potential of exploration and space flight, and the endless possibilities of life elsewhere. (It would also be amazing if the movie reignited interest in ham radio, as Contact a few decades ago, lol).

It was a delightful and joyful movie. I got uncomfortably emotional at parts (largely pertaining to wanting to go into space; see my review of Atmosphere for a similar discussion… In fact, the weird resonance between the two was unintentional and surprising). I really hope that people (particularly families) sit up and take notice before its too late.

Movie Review: BARBIE

Official film poster

The Barbie movie from director Greta Gerwig and lead actors Margot Robbie and Ryan Gosling, was actually shockingly good. I remember being amused by the trailers, and increasingly excited by the reviews (including the whiny male-tears reviews which made me cackle), but I wanted to go into the movie without too high of an expectation. I’ve been disappointed by hype before. But in fact, it was a bit better than I was even expecting.

Visually, it’s stunning. The set, prop, and costume design were impeccable. I don’t know how they made everything really look like giant life-size versions of plastic toys, but they did. The colors are amazing. And even in the switch from “Barbie Land” to the “Real World” the cinematography remains bright and light, even while giving way to more realistic color palettes and lighting choices.

opening scene of Barbie movie, with 2001: A Space Odyssey homage

It was also, frankly, hilarious. I laughed so much, folks. So much. I want to talk about this without giving too much away (but it has been out for a few weeks now so I feel some spoilers are inevitable). Let me just say, the movie opens with a sequence that references (nearly shot for shot in some places) to 2001: A Space Odyssey, with Barbie as the black monolith. I immediately cracked up. That was all I needed. The movie had me from that point on. But it kept getting funnier. One thing I appreciated was the layering of humor. There were parts that were clearly meant to be funny to kids, and some sequences that even straight (well-adjusted) men could find amusing. And then there were all the bits that felt like they were just for me. For left-leaning, adult women who grew up with Barbies and understood the dozens and dozens of references that would go right over the heads of younger girls and were probably too niche for other adults. I was probably the person in the theatre laughing the loudest (this is a fairly common occurrence for me, to be fair. I was by far the loudest laugher in the theatre when I saw The Emperor’s New Groove, for instance).

I also think the movie was very smart and genuine. Earnest even, underneath all the jokes and slapstick comedy.

I’ve been paying attention to a lot of the criticisms and complaints about the movie. Obviously, there’s all the conservative straight (mostly white) men so entangled in their own toxic masculinity and patriarchal power, and crying their pathetic man tears over the awful man-hating “woke” movie. And I have nothing to say to or about those people. I’m not wasting my energy on that. But there have also been critiques from the other side of the aisle, from leftist feminist women complaining that the movie is too simplistic, or dumbed-down, or doesn’t push far enough, etc. And that actually bugs me a little.

Barbie (Margot Robbie) and Ken (Ryan Gosling)

Is the movie particularly nuanced? Of course not. It’s not an academic article on gender theory by Judith Butler. It’s not out here trying to be the next Feminine Mystique, or break new ground in feminist thought. It’s a big-budget summer blockbuster aimed mostly at kids and young women, about a toy, paid for by Mattel. But looked at from that angle – from the angle of a movie built largely to make money, produced by MATTEL – than you have to admit that it’s shockingly smart, with a genuinely good argument/message, and that Greta Gerwig et. al. got a way with a lot. I mean, A LOT.

I mean! There’s a scene where Barbie is shocked to discover the CEO of Mattel is a man, and that there are no men in positions of power in the company. To which the CEO responds (I’m paraphrasing here): “I love women! I’m the son of a woman! I’m the… nephew of an aunt! Some of my best friends are… Jewish!” Clearly highlighting the way he’s so busy trying to defend himself for doing/saying something offensive that he’s forgotten which (of many, no doubt) offensive thing he’s done this time that needs defending. I died laughing.

I’ll also add that while the focus of the movie and the messaging is clearly (and rightfully) on women, their struggles, their pain, their gaze, the movie also still manages to convey the idea that patriarchy and toxic masculinity are just as damaging for the men. None of the men in this movie (least of all Ken) is happy within this system. And the movie is clearly pointing out that they don’t have to feel that way, or live that way!

Barbie (Margot Robbie) and Gloria (America Ferrara)

But America Ferrara’s speech in the last third of the movie was genuinely powerful, and moving, and absolutely stole the show. I saw this movie with my mother, and she absolutely cried during that speech. And she’s a boomer!

Even my brother, who was by far not the target-audience and only came with me out of boredom, admitted that it was funny and enjoyable. Truly, the only demographic who are really not going to like this movie are the thin-skinned white men who are happy to remain in the chokehold of toxic masculinity and enjoy the unjust power that patriarchy has given them. And, frankly, if that’s you, I’d be shocked you’re reading my blog at all. Otherwise, I feel fairly confident that you’ll find the movie at least amusing, if not outright amazing.

(Side note: also, all the memes have been GLORIOUS online.)

Time Travel Narratives Recommended Reading List

To wrap up my little mini series of blog posts about time travel narratives, I am ending with a fairly large recommended reading and viewing list. There’s a bunch of stuff on here, some nonfiction books about the science and theories of time travel, an enormous list of novels, a couple anthologies, and bunch of movies, and a handful of relevant tv shows (mostly from Star Trek, which is famous for their time travel episodes).

This list is not remotely exhaustive. There are hundreds and hundreds of possible books and other media to include in this list. But this is a pretty place to start. It’s a fairly representative list of the most well-known and popular media on the subject. I have not read all of these books, or watched all of these movies (though I have at least some familiarity with a large majority of them).

I have them separated into categories, but they are not in any kind of order whatsoever (not chronological, alphabetical, or quality). Sorry, I was too lazy to work that much out. In any case, have fun with this list!

Non-Fiction Books:

  • Time Travel: The Popular Philosophy of Narrative by David Wittenberg
  • How To Build A Time Machine: The Science Between Time Travel by Brian Clegg
  • Black Holes and Time Warps: Einstein’s Outrageous Legacy by Kip S. Thorne
  • The Science of Interstellar by Kip S. Thorne
  • Time Traveler: A Scientist’s Personal Mission to Make Time Travel a Reality by Dr. Ronald Mallett and Bruce Henderson
  • The Order of Time by Carlo Rovelli
  • Time Travel in Einstein’s Universe: The Physical Possibilities of Travel Through Time by J. Richard Gott

Anthologies:

  • The Time Traveler’s Almanac, edited by Ann and Jeff Vandermeer
  • The Best Time Travel Stories of the 20th Century, edited by Harry Turtledove and Martin H. Greenburg

Novels:

  • The Time Machine by H.G. Wells
  • Time and Again by Jack Finney
  • From Time to Time by Jack Finney
  • End of Eternity by Isaac Asimov
  • Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
  • Time Enough for Love by Robert A. Heinlein
  • A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court by Mark Twain
  • The House on the Strand by Daphne DuMaurier
  • The Man Who Folded Himself by David Gerrold
  • A Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L’Engle
  • Kindred by Octavia Butler
  • Hyperion by Dan Simmons
  • The Time Traveler’s Wife by Audrey Niffenegger
  • The First Fifteen Lives of Harry August by Claire North
  • Outlander by Diana Gabaldon (Book 1 of the Outlander series)
  • Timeline by Michael Crichton
  • Woman on the Edge of Time by Marge Piercy
  • The Accidental Time Machine by Joe Haldeman
  • The Shining Girls by Lauren Beukes
  • 11/22/63 by Stephen King
  • Doomsday Book by Connie Willis
  • To Say Nothing of the Dog by Connie Willis
  • Black Out/All Clear by Connie Willis
  • How to Live Safely in a Science Fictional Universe by Charles Yu
  • This Is How You Lose the Time War by Amal El-Mohtar and Max Gladstone
  • All You Need Is Kill by Hiroshi Sakurazaka 
  • Recursion by Black Crouch
  • Just One Damn Thing After Another by Jodi Taylor (Book 1 of Chronicles of St. Mary’s series)

Movies:

screenshot from The Time Machine (1960)
  • The Time Machine (1960)
  • Terminator
  • Terminator 2
  • Looper
  • Primer
  • Back to the Future
  • Time After Time
  • Planet of the Apes
  • Donnie Darko
  • Groundhog Day
  • Interstellar
  • Safety Not Guaranteed
  • Arrival
  • La Jetee
  • 12 Monkeys
  • The Girl Who Leapt Through Time
  • Your Name
  • Edge of Tomorrow
  • The Philadelphia Experiment
  • Somewhere in Time
  • Time Bandits

TV Episodes:

(These shows all did multiple time travel-centric episodes. I have not listed all of them, just a representative handful.)

screenshot from “The Late Philip J Fry,” Futurama

Futurama — “All’s Well That Roswell,” “The Late Philip J. Fry,” “The Why of Fry,” “Meanwhile”

Star Trek: TOS — “City on the Edge of Forever,” “All Our Yesterdays,” “Tomorrow is Yesterday”

Star Trek: TNG — “Time Squared,” “Yesterday’s Enterprise,” “Time’s Arrow,” “Tapestry,” “All Good Things”

Star Trek: DS9 — “Past Tense,” “Visionary,” “Wrongs Darker than Death or Night,” “Time’s Orphan”

Star Trek: VOY — “Future’s End,” “Before and After,” “Year of Hell,” “Relativity”

*I didn’t really watch Enterprise or Discovery, though I know they also feature plenty of time travel. Also, season 2 of Picard is centered around one giant time travel plot. 

Pretty much all of Doctor Who (obviously,) but I especially recommend “Blink”

Also, all of Quantum Leap, which is a CLASSIC.

Twilight Zone had several of time travel eps, but the one that comes to mind most is “Cradle of Darkness”

Movie Review: Strange World

Today, I want to talk a bit about Strange World, Disney’s newest full-length animated feature film.

Strange World released last November, and it did not do well in theatres. Very few people went to see it, which is a shame. Admittedly, I didn’t see it in theatres either. I waited until it was on Disney+ because of the continuing pandemic issues (which are particularly bad here in Texas where the idiots live). But from what I’ve heard the biggest problem was the lack of proper marketing/publicity. No one knew the movie existed! Or when it was out in theatres! There were almost no commercials for it on tv, only a handful of ads on places like Youtube (where most people still skip ads), no merchandise tie-ins with McDonalds or toys released ahead of the movie (which is standard practice! Sometimes the toys start popping up a full 6 months or year before the movie comes out!). NOTHING.

It is believed by many (including me) that this was probably an intentional decision by some of the higher-ups at Disney. ‘Cause here’s the thing: Strange World features the first interracial married couple/family in a full-length Disney animated film. It features a gay main character, whose gayness is not remarked on by a single other person in the movie as anything but completely normal (though I will say that after the fact, I saw several articles claiming that this was Disney’s ‘first gay romance’ and it is no such thing. That is really overstating the matter. The character IS gay. It’s not subtext. He very clearly states that he has a crush on a boy. But that element is background detail to the actual plot. There’s no ‘romance’ involved). It also features a plot that is a very blunt, hard-hitting, unapologetic allegory for our current environmental crisis and our over-reliance on fossil fuels.

Certain parts of Disney audiences (such as me) have been demanding, for years, better representation and diversity in Disney films, which Disney higher-ups have been pushing back against in various ways — mostly due to a fear of losing more conservative audiences in the US, and the entirety of the very lucrative and very conservative Chinese markets. It’s all about the money.

So, Disney finally gives us what we’ve been asking for, a very diverse and progressive story in which they clearly told the animators: “have fun! Go nuts!” and the animators totally brought it. And then they don’t ADVERTISE THE MOVIE AT ALL. And, unsurprisingly, the movie TANKS at the box office because no one knows it exists. But now Disney can point to the abysmal sales and wave their hands and say: “see! You said you wanted this, but then no one came to watch it and it failed, which means no one really wanted it at all and we can go back to what we were doing! We tried! Really! It’s not our fault the market isn’t there for this kind of thing! Back to the old standbys!”

The Disney higher-ups wanted it to fail, so that they would have an excuse to not do it again. I firmly believe that. And it’s a shame because the actual creators: the writers, the animators, the voice actors, etc. absolutely WANT to do this kind of thing, and want it to work and do well. And frankly, they KILLED it with this movie. It’s fucking GREAT. AND NO ONE SAW IT.

Let me expound on the actual movie now, for a bit.

Strange World, Disney’s 61st animated feature film, was written by Qui Nguyen, directed by Don Hall, and stars Jake Gyllenhall, Dennis Quaid, Jaboukie Young-White, Gabrielle Union, and Lucy Liu. The first thing that appealed to me when I finally DID see any trailers or commercials about this movie was the great 30s or 40s style pulp scifi feel of it. It’s even a hollow-earth story! And the movie as a whole really holds up to that early vibe.

The movie opens in Avolonia, a country completely isolated by surrounding impenetrable mountains, with an economy and culture that has grown stagnant. The great explorer Jaeger Clade (voiced by Quaid) has made it his mission to cross the wall of mountains to discover what exists beyond their lands, and bring new hope for the future to Avolonia. To that end, he drags his teenage son, Searcher (Gyllenhall), with him (very clearly against his will). But when Searcher discovers a strange plant in the mountains that releases electrical charges, he and the rest of their exploring crew realize that the plant is the key to their future prosperity and decide not to continue the journey. Infuriated, Jaeger continues on alone while Searcher returns home with the plant they call Pando.

Flash forward 25 years, and Searcher is a Pando farmer, who is regarded as a hero for bringing this plant back to Avolonia and thus ushering in a new era of modern technology including enormous airships and all the things one might expect with electrical power. His wife, Meridian (Union), and his son Ethan (Young-White) work the farm with him. However, Ethan longs for adventure, unknowingly very similar to Jaeger, the grandfather he has never met, and who is presumed dead somewhere in the mountains. Ethan also has a massive crush on his friend Diazo – a fact that is treated with the same kind of “isn’t he so cute” attitude as if the crush were a girl rather than a boy.

Everything changes when Callisto – once a member of Jaeger and Searcher’s exploring crew and now the President of Avolonia – arrives on a massive airship, and announces that Pando is dying. In order to save their way of life, Callisto asks Searcher (the expert on Pando) to travel with her to an enormous hole they have found in the mountains that appears to lead to a hollow-earth-type place and what they believe to be the SOURCE of Pando. Unsurprisingly, Ethan stows away, and Meridian follows, and when the airship descends into the hole to find a wondrous, bonkers world that exists beneath the mountains, the adventure really gets going.

From there, a lot happens. They are attacked by various creatures. They, of course, find Jaeger who has been trapped in the hollow earth for the last 25 years. Ethan becomes more and more enamored of adventuring, making Searcher feel as if he is being abandoned again, just like his father left him all those years ago. And throughout it all, there is a message of learning to coexist with the nature and creatures around you, rather than simply steamrolling over everything and believing you know what is best for the world. The conflict comes to a head when the travelers realize that Pando might be hurting everything, and will ultimately lead to their doom even if it is expedient in the interim, and must make a decision about how they will face the future not only for themselves but for all of their people.

It is not a subtle message. And frankly, GOOD ON THEM. Sometimes the themes need to be heavy-handed if you hope to get anyone to even notice, let alone pay attention. Especially these days. And it’s a message that works, and is worth hitting you over the head with.

On top of that, it’s also just a really fun movie! There’s a lot of humor and running gags throughout the movie. The family conflict between Jaeger, Searcher, and Ethan is touching, and relatable, and comes to a satisfying conclusion. The action sequences are enjoyable. And visually, it’s a joy to behold. Like I said, the studio clearly told the set and creature design animators to just got to town, go wild and they did not hold back! They went as bonkers as they could manage, and obviously had a blast doing it, and the visuals are just STUNNING. Colorful, and strange, and imaginative, and funny, and just so much fun.

So, all of this is just to say, essentially: if you missed out on this movie in theatres, like most of us did, and if you maybe didn’t even know it existed, I highly recommend you go check it out now! It’s on Disney+ right now. Make a family night of it – pop some popcorn, turn the lights down, grab the kids (if you have them, lol), or settle in by yourself with a glass of wine (like I did), and enjoy! I promise you won’t regret it!

Movie Review: Godmothered

Last week I said I had a couple holiday movies I wanted to review, and I posted the first one (for Happiest Season), and then completely forgot to write the second one! So, here I present to you my movie review for the other new holiday movie I watched over Christmas break: Godmothered.

Godmothered is a Disney movie that was released directly to Disney+ on Dec 4th, starring Isla Fisher and Jillian Bell. It is clearly in the tradition of Disney holiday movies meant for whole families, and I frankly: I thought it was really REALLY cute!

The basic premise is this: Jillian Bell plays Eleanor, a fairy in training in “The Motherland” to become a Fairy Godmother, only she discovers that no new fairy has been made an official Godmother in YEARS because there are no more missions. And there are no more missions because people on Earth have stopped believing in magic and happily-ever-afters. The head-Godmother Moira, played by Jane Curtin (which was both strange and amusing), announces that the Motherland is officially going to be closed, and all fairies will be made into Tooth Fairies. Eleanor decides she won’t accept this: she finds a single mission, a wish from a little girl named Mackenzie, and goes to Earth to give Mackenzie a happy ending and prove that Godmothers are still needed.

Lo! And behold, however: the wish is old, and Mackenzie is now an adult woman with two children, working at a failing trash-news station. She is widowed, miserable, and has mostly checked out of her childrens’ lives. When Eleanor arrives, Mackenzie is understandably skeptical and then HORRIFIED when she discovers that Eleanor really IS magical. Mayhem and hijinks ensure, during which Eleanor decides that Mackenzie’s happily-ever-after must mean that she should fall in love with her attractive, charmingly-geeky coworker at the news station, aptly named Hugh PRINCE, who must SURELY be her TRUE LOVE. Eleanor causes several disasters and highly embarrassing situations (I am very sensitive to secondhand embarrassment and squirmed through a couple scenes). And the movie ends, of course, happily, but perhaps not in the way one might expect.

I really enjoyed this movie. It was sweet and charming and funny. Clearly, it must be safe for children, but I found for the most part that it played as much to adults who would understand and empathize with Mackenzie’s disillusionment with romance, happy endings, and life in general. Isla Fisher and Gillian Bell are wonderful in the movie. They’re funny and played off each other very well. Santiago Cabrera, who plays Hugh Prince, was (as I said) charmingly-geeky and adorably idealistic. Even the two children were pretty good (and I usually find child actors in these kinds of movies either FAR too twee, or just plain-old BAD). Quite a few scenes made me laugh out loud, and even the more cheesy scenes weren’t TOO cheesy. But what I really appreciated about this movie was the ENDING.

AND HERE WE GET INTO A SPOILER FOR THE ENDING OF THE MOVIE! CONTINUE AT YOUR OWN RISK!

At the end of the movie, following all of Eleanor’s failed attempts to get Mackenzie and Hugh together in the belief that this is the ONLY TRUE Happily-Ever-After, Mackenzie comes to a realization. Eleanor has succeeded in giving her a Happily-Ever-After (despite Moira’s claims that she has failed and therefore the Motherland will close as planned), NOT because she’s in love with Hugh, but because she has reminded Mackenzie how to enjoy the small things in life, and helped her reconnect with her children. She announces (to a rather large audience) that her True Love is her CHILDREN, that they give her life meaning and happiness. She says that there is no single kind of True Love, and no single kind of Happily-Ever-After. And then the  camera pans to a father looking at his son, a grandson looking at his grandmother, etc etc etc. And folks it was FANTASTIC. It was such a great message! 

The movie hints to possible future development between Mackenzie and Hugh, but the happy ending does not HINGE on that fact AT ALL. And it was WONDERFUL.

So yeah… I really enjoyed this movie. I think it’s a great movie for families, and possibly also a great movie for adults who are perhaps lonely or disillusioned with life in general. At the very least, I bet it’ll make you smile for a little while! 

Movie Review: Happiest Season

I haven’t been watching a ton of movies lately. Mostly, I’ve been re-watching the same dozen or so movies (mostly Disney movies) or tv shows over and over again for months, because it brings me comfort. I read something once about how people with severe anxiety tend to rewatch the same handful of things over and over again because you already know what’s going to happen and you don’t have to deal with the tension or fear of uncertainty, or cliffhangers, or whatever. I’d say this is pretty accurate. I also don’t really watch anything too dark or heavy lately, even if I have seen it before and know that it’ll end up ok. I’ve been sticking to gentler, happier things (don’t ask me how many times I have watched Hilda or Phineas & Ferb lately; the number has got to be in the dozens by now).

But I did watch two new holiday movies over Christmas, so I figured I might as well offer a couple movie reviews over the next few days.

The first is for Happiest Season, streaming on Hulu, and starring Kristen Stewart and Mackenzie Davis. You probably saw commercials for this at some point, and possibly a bunch of people talking about it online right after it came out. (Ha! Came out! How apropos!). Happiest Season is a Christmas movie, first and foremost, and it is also one of a very small number of LGBT/queer holiday films. Kristen Stewart and Mackenzie Davis play lesbian couple Abby and Harper. Abby doesn’t like Christmas, because it reminds her of her parents who died when she was 19. Harper wants to get her girlfriend into the holiday spirit and so invites her home for Christmas — only to reveal at the last possible second that she is not actually OUT to her family, and that Abby will have to pretend to just be a roommate Harper is bringing home because she had nowhere else to go for the holidays. All this deflates Abby’s plan to propose to Harper on Christmas eve.

As it turns out, Harper’s family are a) stinking filthy rich, b) politically-motivated (her father is running for mayor), and c) absolutely TERRIFYINGLY HORRIBLE PEOPLE. The parents, played by Mary Steenburgen and Victor Garber and completely obsessed with giving the appearance of a perfect family (perfect, here, of course defined by very conservative values), and Harper and her three sisters are all back-biting bullies who are constantly fighting for supremacy and their father’s apparently-limited attention and love.

Meanwhile, poor Abby has been thrown to the wolves of this family with little warning or support from her girlfriend, who has turned into a completely different person before her eyes. Add in Harper’s ex-boyfriend, who clearly wants to rekindle their relationship (spurred on by Harper’s oblivious parents), and everything is sure to go to shit very quickly. In the middle of all this, Abby meets Harper’s ex-girlfriend Riley, played to perfection by Aubrey Plaza (can I just have a movie about HER character?), who knows well how Abby feels: she was likewise hidden away by Harper throughout their entire relationship, until Harper eventually outed Riley in a panic at the prospect of being caught.

So, let’s get down to brass tacks: I was so excited about the prospect of a qeer-women holiday movie when this first released, and  there are certainly parts of this movie I really liked. Kristen Stewart was wonderful in the role and she did a great job of coming across as sweet and earnest and more than a little heartbroken. Aubrey Plaza, as I said, was a delight. Probably the highlight of the whole film (unsurprisingly) was Dan Levy, playing Abby’s best friend. He’s saved from being the stereotypical token “sassy gay friend” by the fact that, of course, half the characters are gay. And, of course, because Dan Levy is just that FUNNY.

But it is flawed. The secondhand embarrassment of several scenes, when Abby is put in awkward situations, was so bad I literally couldn’t watch them. I had to fast-forward (thank god I hadn’t been able to watch this in theatres!). Harper’s parents are HORRENDOUS. And Harper spends most of the movie abandoning, gaslight, and emotionally-torturing Abby. Because this is a Christmas movie, we all know going on that there’s going to be a magical reconciliation at the end. Every Christmas movie has one, some more forced and unbelievable than others. This one takes the cake for unbelievability. Harper at NO POINT does any real thing to earn Abby’s trust or forgiveness. Nor does anything in the plot make us believe for a SECOND than Harper’s parents would just magically flip a switch and be okay with Harper’s sexuality at the end. And yet, that’s what we’re left with at the end.

Several reviewers (such as this article from Screenrant, and this blog post, just to list a couple) and many comments on Twitter have said the same thing I’m going to say: the chemistry between Abby and Riley was MUCH more believable by the end, and I think a more emotionally-honest and satisfying ending would have been if Abby broke up with Harper and got together with Riley, and Harper had to learn to accept her own sexuality on more honest and mature terms. All of this is frustrating because I am torn: on one hand, I have been dying for (and am very grateful for) a movie about lesbians that didn’t end with tragedy. SO MANY lesbian romance movies end with the couple breaking up in the face of societal pressure, or one or both of them dying, and I am SICK TO DEATH OF IT. But on the other hand, THIS particular happy ending just didn’t feel EARNED by the story in any real way. So… I’m stuck somewhere in the middle.

All in all, I’d give Happiest Season maybe a 3 stars out of 5?

One thing I can say for this movie: I have been playing around with the idea of writing my own queer-women-rom-com for awhile now, and this movie pushed me over the edge to actually trying to DO it. I’ve been sketching out notes and outlines for about a month now, so we’ll see how that goes…

Anime Review: Venus Wars (1989)

Last night I had the opportunity to see an anime film I hadn’t seen, or even really heard of, before, called Venus Wars. My brother got his hands on a copy of the dvd (apparently not an easy endeavor). And while I know this blog is mostly for books, I think I’ve established by now that I really love anime so I thought I’d share.

Venus Wars is an anime film produced in 1989, based on a manga series of the same name, by  Yoshikazu Yasuhiko, that ran from 1987 to 1989. The basic premise of both the manga and the anime is that the planet Venus in 2012 and by the year 2089 it has a population of millions. There are two main continents, Ishtar and Aphrodia (I love the naming, as Venus, Ishtar, and Aphrodite are all goddesses of love), and the two are at war in an attempt to create a unified government. The story opens in the Io, the capital city of Aphrodia, and introduces a team of 80s-style-punk-biker-gang-type racers, who ride battlebikes or “monocycles” (as they only have one wheel). The team includes the main character, hot-headed Hiro (of course!) and several other characters such as Will, and Miranda, the kickass red-head captain of the team (who looks rather a lot like Priss from the 80s Bubblegum Crisis). Simultaneously, we are introduced to Susan Sommers, a blonde, blue-eyed, somewhat bitchy news reporter/war correspondent who has come from peaceful “civilized” Earth to cover the war on Venus. Unsurprisingly, these two sets of main characters meet and team up when a huge force from Ishtar invades Io with gigantic tanks and occupies the city.

I cannot speak to the manga, of course, but I have mixed feelings about the anime. I did enjoy it, and I’m still thinking about it (thus this blog post). It was very 80s in style. Very 80s. Enjoyably 80s, since that’s what I grew up with, but also regrettably 80s in some respects. I loved the animation style. Everything was hand-drawn, for one thing(!), which is not so true these days. And everything had texture and movement and personality. The score, by Joe Hisaishi (who went on to become famous for doing all the Studio Ghibli scores) is fantastic (and also fantastically 80s). But I also had a lot of critiques or complaints.

For one thing, the movie felt contradictorily too long and crammed with too much plot, while also feeling a little thin on plot at the same time. What I mean though, is that there was A LOT going on, and there is a lot of meat on the bones of the story, BUT the writers were clearly trying to shove WAY too much of the plot of the much longer manga into 100 minutes, leading to a story that was too cramped and jumped around too much, while not giving enough time to fully develop either the characters, or the actual actions of the plot.

A lot of the characters were pretty flat, some of the motivations made little sense, some characters popped up quickly for no apparent reason and disappeared again just as quickly and with just as little reason. The setting/world-building was not particularly well-established, such that I spent the first 20 minutes or so just trying to figure out who had invaded who — I couldn’t tell if the city Io was in Ishtar or Aphrodia and therefore couldn’t tell which government was supposed to be the “bad guy.” Some of the jumps in scene and time were also confusing and difficult to follow. And the whole story supposedly takes place over the course of just 3 or 4 days, which makes some of the character relationships dubious at best (the blonde reporter, Susan, falls in love with Will the racer in like… the blink of an eye?).

All that said, I did actually enjoy the movie, and I think it did some really interesting things with its depictions of war. The racers, young and stupid, are very excited about the prospect of war and fighting at first (at teenagers often are), and then the movie spends a great deal of time beating that out of them, so that by the end all of them have bailed on the fighting. Likewise, war correspondent Susan Sommers is creepily gleeful about the invasion at the beginning of the movie, filming everything with her little handheld camera and urging the tanks to keep firing until they start firing at her, and she gets angry. But by the end of the movie, she has witnessed some of the true horrors of war and has gained much needed compassion and anger at the various injustices.

I can only imagine that the manga has the time and space to do full justice to both the characters and the themes of the story, that the movie can only vaguely gesture at.

(I will note that there are a couple pretty offensive bits: some really sexist comments thrown around with so much as a blink of an eye, and a random gay soldier who makes an appearance near the end for no apparent reason other than to revel in an offensive stereotype and then get killed. These bits are unfortunately par for the course in the 80s, but still infuriating.)

On the whole though, I liked it well enough to still be thinking about it, and to start digging around online for the manga, which apparently has been out of print since 1993… so, happy hunting to me, I guess?

Top 25 Favorite Movies (Live Action)

A couple months ago, I did a list of my top 20 favorite books, and mentioned that I might enjoy doing a list for movies later. I started said list ages ago and then forgot about it until now. So, I figured I would go ahead and finish it.

It was supposed to be my top 20 favorite movies of all time. But I ran into some trouble. I love movies. I love movies A LOT. And the initial list grew WAY out of my control very quickly. The first thing I did was separate live action and animated movies into two separate lists. But even then my live action list had 38 movies on it! I whittled it down and whittled it down, but I could not seem to get down farther than 25. I just couldn’t do it! And so, I just left it as is.

Below, please find a list of my top 25 favorite movies (live action), in no particular order (because I am almost INCAPABLE of putting things I love into a hierarchy):

  1. The Fall
  2. Lord of the Rings: Two Towers
  3. The Mummy
  4. The Labyrinth 
  5. Lawrence of Arabia
  6. The Last Emperor
  7. The Princess Bride
  8. The Court Jester
  9. Ladyhawke
  10. Blade Runner
  11. Mad Max: Fury Road
  12. The Sound of Music
  13. Pride and Prejudice (2005 version)
  14. Wings of Desire
  15. Hero
  16. Muppet’s Christmas Carol
  17. Holiday
  18. Arsenic and Old Lace
  19. Interstellar
  20. The Abyss
  21. Apollo 13
  22. Star Wars: A New Hope
  23. Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan
  24. The Pirate
  25. Summer Stock

A couple fun things to note: there are two different Judy Garland movies, and two different Cary Grant movies on this list. They are two of my favorite actors of all time. Yes, a good majority of the movies on this list are science fiction or fantasy (just like my list of favorite books). Also: GIVE ME ALL THE SPACE MOVIES! A few of the honorable mentions that started on this list and had to be knocked off include: The Usual Suspects, pretty much every other Judy Garland movie, Metropolis, Persuasion (1995 BBC tv movie version), and 1917 (which I think would have been the most recent movie to make it on the list if I hadn’t removed it).

I would love to hear from you all! What are you favorite movies? Do we share any in common? Did I list any you aren’t even familiar with? If so, I would love to talk about them more and share them with you! Let me know!

In Search of Portal Fantasies

It’s been well-established that I love fantasies. Both in written and visual media. And one of my favorite sub-genres of fantasy is the portal fantasy: stories in which a character finds a way to step through a portal/door/passage/etc out of the “real” world and into a fantasy world.

There are many many examples of this narrative in written texts, especially in children’s literature. Some of our best classics are of this genre, including The Chronicles of Narnia and The Neverending Story and The Wizard of Oz. There have been more adult versions of this genre as well, of course. Neverwhere by Neil Gaiman, and more recently Alix E. Harrow’s The Ten Thousand Doors of January jump immediately to mind. And there are others that maybe skirt the edge of what does and does not count — for instance, Edgar Rice Burrough’s Barsoom novels (Princess of Mars, etc) are technically part of a sub-genre called Planetary Romance, but because John Carter finds what is essentially a magically means of transporting from Earth to Mars it sort of fits (even though Mars is, of course, just a planet in our same universe and not actually some separate magical universe or dimension).

In any case, there are dozens and dozens, probably hundreds, of examples in literature. But I am trying to come up with a list of examples in FILM, and it is a little more difficult. There are plenty of obvious ones, of course, and most of those are film adaptations of books already mentioned such as The Neverending Story and the Chronicles of Narnia, but I feel certain there are many more films than just the ones I can think of. I’ve tried googling, but it has been less than helpful. If anyone has any suggestions I can add to the following list, I would love to hear from you! Please share!

So, here’s my list of portal fantasies in film that I can think of:

  1. The Neverending Story
  2. The Chronicles of Narnia movies
  3. The Golden Compass (sort of — the portal fantasy element becomes more evident in the later books and doesn’t show up in the movie much)
  4. Wizard of Oz
  5. The Labyrinth
  6. Coraline
  7. Stardust 
  8. Alice in Wonderland (all the iterations)
  9. Enchanted
  10. Time Bandits
  11. The 10th Kingdom
  12. The Pagemaster (who else remembers this movie from the 90s!?)
  13. The Flight of Dragons (even more obscure! I seem to be the only one who remembers this movie!)
  14. Neverwhere (surprisingly, this tv movie version came before the book this time!)
  15. Mirrormask (also by Neil Gaiman!)
  16. Spirited Away
  17. Escaflowne
  18. Stargate (not really, of course, since its SF and the portals go to actual planets in “our” universe, but I feel like Stargate is in some ways the SF answer to portal fantasy)

As I said, surely there are more that I just can’t think of! If you know of any good ones, please let me know!

One thing to note: I have not included much anime, other than Spirited Away and Escaflowne, because usually those fall into a slightly different category. A lot of anime (though not all) that sort of fits this category is called Isekai anime, and while they are technically portal fantasies, they follow a very specific formula of characters falling into RPGs — all the way down to containing the usual RPG elements such as classes, guilds, and CP or HP, etc. And these just… feel different to me (and they all start to be exactly the same after awhile – see examples such as That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime or Sword Art Online). This type of anime didn’t ALWAYS follow that formula, older ones such as Magic Knight Rayearth and Fushigi Yuugi certainly didn’t. The recent boom of Isekai anime (and manga and light novels) in the last 10 years or so has certainly all been of this type.

Edit made 19 July 2020:
I have been reminded of a few more portal fantasy films that I had forgotten about:
Pan’s Labyrinth
Warriors of Virtue (such a cheesy movie, and several of my colleagues scoffed at it, but I LOVED this movie as a kid!)
The Phantom Tollbooth (a classic! How dare I forget this movie!)
Little Nemo: Adventures in Slumberland
Jumanji
Zathura
(Jumanji’s cousin, lol)